Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±³ÇÕ¸é ¿ì½Äº´¼ÒÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Áø´Ü¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ºñ±³¿¬±¸

IN VITRO COMPARISON OF VARIOUS DIAGNOSTIC METHODS OF OCCLUSAL CAR10US LESIONS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 28±Ç 4È£ p.613 ~ 619
±èÀç°ï, ±è¿µÁø, ±è¿µ½Å, ¹éº´ÁÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀç°ï ( Kim Jae-Gon ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× ±¸°­»ýü°úÇבּ¸¼Ò
±è¿µÁø ( Kim Young-Jin ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× ±¸°­»ýü°úÇבּ¸¼Ò
±è¿µ½Å ( Kim Young-Shin ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¹éº´ÁÖ ( Baik Byeong-Ju ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× ±¸°­»ýü°úÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

±³ÇÕ¸éÀÇ ¿­±¸´Â ¿ì½ÄÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇϱ⠽¬¿î À§Ä¡À̸ç, ƯÈ÷ Ãʱâ¿ì½Äº´¼Ò´Â °ÇÀüÇØ º¸ÀÌ´Â ¹ý¶ûÁú ÇϹ濡¼­ ÁøÇàµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹°í, ÁÖÀ§ °ÇÀü ¹ý¶ûÁú°ú Àß ±¸º°µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Æ¼­ ÁÖ±âÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¿ì½ÄÀÇ Ä¡·á ½Ã±â¸¦ ³õÄ¡´Â °æ¿ì°¡ Á¾Á¾ ÀÖ´Ù. Ãʱ⠿ì½ÄÀ» Á¶±â¿¡ Áø´ÜÇÒ °æ¿ì ºÒ¼ÒµµÆ÷, ½ÄÀÌÁ¶Àý, Ä¡ÅÂÁ¶Àý ´É·Â°³¼± ±×¸®°í Ÿ¾×ºÐºñ ÃËÁø µîÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ±× º´¸®Àû °úÁ¤À» Â÷´ÜÇÏ°í, Á¶±â¿¡ Ä¡·áÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ Á¶±â Áø´ÜÀº Áß¿ä½ÃµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ß°ÅµÈ Ä¡¾Æ¿¡¼­ ±³ÇÕ¸é ¿ì½ÄÀ» °ËÃâÇϱâ À§ÇØ µÎ°¡Áö ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ Áø´Ü¹ýÀÎ ½ÃÁø, ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ·¹ÀÌÀú Çü±¤ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ¿ì½ÄÁø´Ü±â±¸ÀÎ Diagnodent (Biberach, Germany)ÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ, ƯÀ̵µ ±×¸®°í Á¤È®µµ¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÔÀ¸·Î¼­ ±³ÇÕ¸é Ãʱ⠿ì½Ä º´¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡Àå ½Å·Ú¼º ÀÖ´Â Áø´Ü ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. Diagnodent´Â °ÇÀüÄ¡¿¡¼­ 7.8, Ãʱâ¿ì½Ä¿¡¼­ 25.4, ¹ý¶ûÁú ¿ì½Ä¿¡¼­´Â 30.5 ±×¸®°í »ó¾ÆÁú ¿ì½Ä¿¡¼­´Â 53.8ÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. 2. ¿°·á¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡¾ÆÁ¶Á÷Ç¥º»°Ë»ç¿Í ½ºÇǾ°ú ÇǾ »ó°ü°è¼ö¿¡¼­ Diagnodent(0.736, 0.619)¿Í ½ÃÁø(0.664, 0.666)¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â°í ¹æ»ç¼± ÃÔ¿µ°Ë»ç(0.333, 0.335)¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³·Àº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù(P<0.01 Àüü). 3. ±³ÇÕ¸é ¿ì½ÄÁø´ÜÀÇ Á¤È®µµ´Â Diagnodent°¡ 65%·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç°¡ 34%·Î °¡Àå ³·¾Ò´Ù. 4. Ãʱ⠿ì½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì, DiagnodentÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ¿Í ƯÀ̵µ°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ¹ý¶ûÁú ¿ì½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì, ½ÃÁøÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç DiagnodentÀÇ Æ¯À̵µ°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù. »ó¾ÆÁú ¿ì½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì, DiagnodentÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ¿Í ƯÀ̵µ°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ½ÃÁøÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ°¡ °¡Àå ³·¾Ò´Ù.ed sealant´Â ±â°èÀû »èÁ¦ ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í »êºÎ½Ä ¹æ¹ý¸¸À» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì ¸ðµÎ ¿­±¸ ħÅõµµ³ª ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ À־ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î º¸¾Æ Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»öÁ¦ µµÆ÷ ½Ã ¿­±¸ ħÅõµµ°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÏ°í ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀÌ ÀûÀº ±â°èÀû »èÁ¦ ¹æ¹ý°ú ¹°¸®Àû ¼ºÁúÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÑ filled sealantÀÇ »ç¿ëÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ´Ù°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ±³ÇÕ·ÂÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀ̳ª Àå±â°£ÀÇ ÀÓ»ó½ÇÇèÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.5).vac/PEÇʸ§Àº Àå±âÀúÀå½Ã »ç¿ëÀÌ ÁÁÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. 2) Áú¼Ò°¡½º ¹× ź»ê°¡½ºÅõ°úµµ °¢°¢ $61.6{\mu}PVDC/PE/Al-vac/CPS\;12.5,\;59.8>96.9{\mu}PE/PVDC/PE\;7.1,\;42.0>79.3{\mu}ET/PVDC/L-LDPE\;6.4,\;34.2>72.2{\mu}PET/PVDC/PE/Al-vac/PE\;0.74,\;4.2cc/m^2.24hr{\cdot}atm$À¸·Î °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ PET/PVDC/PE/Al-vac/PE º¹ÇÕÇʸ§ÀÌ Àå±âÀúÀå¿ëÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëÀÌ ÁÁÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.Ź߻ýÀ» ¿¬±¸Çϴµ¥ ±âÃÊÀûÀÎ ÀÚ·á·Î È°¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú À¯ÀÇÈ®·üÀÌ 0.05 ÀÌÇÏÀÎ ¼öÄ¡µéÀº Hb°ú Albumin, K, Na°£, Neutrophil°ú Leukocyte°£À̾ú°í »ó°ü°è ¼öÄ¡´Â »çÀÌ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À¯ÀÇÈ®·ü 0.01ÀÌÇÏ·Î Á¶»çµÈ ¼öÄ¡´Â Cholesterol°ú ALT°£, LDH¿Í Platelet, Creatinine°£, Platelet¿Í BUN°£, Na¿Í K¼öÄ¡°£ À̾úÀ¸¸ç »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â »çÀÌ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 5. ³ó¾çȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ÀÇ °Ë»çÄ¡°£ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú À¯ÀÇÈ®·üÀÌ 0.05ÀÌÇÏÀÎ ¼öÄ¡µéÀº CRP¿Í Neutrophil°£ À̾ú°í »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â 0.

The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of cnventional visual examination, radiography and a new laser fluorescence method, KaVo Diagnodent, for the detection of occlusal caries lesions. One hundred sound human premolars and molars which had no restorations or interproximal cavities were tested by three methods. Tooth lesions depth was assessed at histologic examination using Caries detector dye The following results were obtained. 1. Diagnodent show 7.8 in sound tooth, 25.4 in initial caries, 30.5 in enamel caries, and 53.8 in dentin caries with average score 2. Spearman and Pearson relation coefficient was high between tooth-specimen test with dye and Diagnodent(0.736, 0.619), visual examination(0.664, 0.666), and was low between tooth-specimen test with dye and radiographic examination(P<0.01, total) 3. Accuracy of occlusal caries was highest on Diagnodent(65%) and lowest on radiographic examination(35%) 4. In initial caries, the sensitivity and specificity of Diagnodent method was the highest. In enamel caries, the sensitivity of visual examination was the highest and specificity of Diagnodent method was the highest. In dentinal caries, the sensitivity and specificity of Diagnodent method was the highest and sensitivity of visual examination was the lowest.

Å°¿öµå

½ÃÁø;¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç;Ãʱâ¿ì½Äº´¼Ò
Diagnodent;Visual examination;Radiography examination;Early caries lesion

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI